|
|
Post by Dolphin on Mar 20, 2011 16:18:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Eric on Mar 21, 2011 9:30:09 GMT -5
Thank you for posting
|
|
|
|
Post by ღAmiღ on Mar 24, 2011 6:36:50 GMT -5
....Strange o.0 Thanks for posting!
|
|
|
|
Post by critteriffic on Mar 25, 2011 12:00:12 GMT -5
I remember something called Shelly Duvals Fairy Tales, and in that version, the sea witch mentioned she used to be the queens bridge partner.
|
|
|
|
Post by buckmana on Apr 1, 2011 16:44:20 GMT -5
Yes, I do recall this from the DVD set when I was indulging in my extras watching spree.
The question is, it is accepted as canon or disregarded because it didn't make it to the final version of the film?
Personally, I think it would have added an extra edge to Ursula if she was plotting against her closest relatives.
|
|
freelancer
Blowfish
True bulletproof Love
Posts: 25
|
Post by freelancer on May 21, 2011 20:02:30 GMT -5
This is very interesting.
In the final version, Ursula does say that she used to live in the palace and in the earlier version of Poor Unfortunate Souls, Ariel says that Ursula tried to overthrow her father... no mention of them being related, though.
Do you think that the 'aunt' subplot was abandoned from the TLM movie or was created for the Broadway show?
|
|
|
|
Post by lilmax on Dec 15, 2012 16:17:24 GMT -5
It was considered in the original script; but like many other things it was scrapped.
|
|
